mp3.

This year, my wife and I finally joined the ranks of twenty-first century music listeners with our first mp3 players (thanks Craig). 

 

So my first complaint is all the different formats that are out there.  My wife’s Sansa player will do mp3’s, but she bought a bunch of songs online from WalMart, which only uses a copy-protected wma format.  And, of course, the wma format, being a windows thing, doesn’t play on my ipod.  The license is supposedly good for up to three machines, so in theory the music police will at least let me play her wma’s on my computer, assuming of course that we go through the rigmarole of setting up the licensing (which isn’t going to happen).  Because she started with that format, she’s also been ripping her CDs as wma’s, meaning if I want some of her songs I have to go back and rip them again.  Great.

                                                                                                                

It used to be that I bought songs on a record, cassette, or CD, and they were mine.  Apparently, now I’m just renting a song until the next hard drive crash.  I’m just guessing, but I really really doubt that a song I pay for as an mp3 will last for half as long as a song I buy on CD.  So, the music companies will score yet again in a few years when I have to download another copy.  And how is it that the music companies are losing so much money when they’re charging us to download songs we’ve already bought on records or cassettes?

 

On the plus side, it looks like the whole digital rights thing is on its way out, which is fantastic.  And, Amazon has finally arrived on its white horse to give us an alternative to itunes.  But now it’s getting harder to find CDs!  Major chains are stocking fewer CDs because so many people are just downloading mp3s.  And this brings us to the worst things about mp3s – we’re now actually paying more or less the same price for a crappier product.  Compressed songs?  I’m no audiophile, but I resent the fact that the trend is toward poorer audio quality.  If I’m paying for a downloaded song, I should be giving me the 44.1-kHz 16-bit wave file, not the crummy hyper-compressed mp3.  If I want to compress it, I’ll rip it myself.  Or am I allowed to say that?

 

I’ve actually started the arduous task of converting some of the songs on my old cassettes to mp3.  It’s a lot more labor-intensive than ripping a CD, and the sound quality isn’t as good (I never really appreciated just how high the noise floor is on cassettes), but dammit, I already paid for these songs and I don’t think I should have to pay for them again.  And again.  And again.


screeds & diatribes

home