the network.

Remember the days when you bought a computer and a monitor and a printer, hooked them all up, and it just worked?  And it did everything you needed?  And it was stable?

 

The trend in computers has been to tie everything to the network, and I think it’s a mistake.  Why won’t it print?  Because the network is down.  Or, the network is so complicated that only specially trained and certified computer dorks can set it up, correctly checking or not checking every single appropriate box in every mysterious submenu. 

 

OK, so I like being able to print to the high-quality printer down the hall from my office, and on the rare occasion that I can get a connection established from the lab to my office it’s nice to be able to move data files over the network instead of on a floppy or USB stick.  But it’s such a headache establishing that connection that I don’t bother; I’m going back to my office anyway, so it’s easier to just sneaker-net my data. 

 

When it’s working, yep, it’s great.  When it’s down or (more likely) just behaving in some inexplicable way, it’s rotten.  And the thing is that it’s gotten so complicated that most problems can’t be self-diagnosed.  I suspect it’s a case of the IT guys protecting their turf, ensuring their employment by setting things up in such a convoluted way that no one else can fix things when they break.  But then maybe I’m just cynical and paranoid.


screeds & diatribes

home